Greenbeam uses capability matching to help people understand how well someone aligns with a role or opportunity.
Rather than relying on a single measure, matching combines two important signals:
Together, these signals provide a more practical picture of current fit, highlight potential skill gaps, and identify areas that could improve readiness over time.
Matching can be influenced by several factors, including:
As your profile changes, your matches may also change.
Capability matching helps you understand how well you align with different roles and opportunities.
Your matches can show:
Keeping your skill profile up to date helps improve the quality and usefulness of your matches.
Managers can use capability matching to understand how people align with a specific role or opportunity.
Greenbeam supports different matching approaches depending on the decision being made:
Managers may also see additional assessment information, such as whether skills have been self-assessed, manager assessed, fully aligned, or are still awaiting assessment.
To help produce more accurate and useful matches:
Managers and team leaders should also review whether skill assessments have been completed and aligned where appropriate.
Match scores can change as your skill profile is updated, assessments are completed, skill levels change, or the requirements of a role are updated. A changing score does not necessarily mean your potential has changed.
No. Potential is only one part of capability matching. Changes to skills, assessments, or role requirements can also affect your match score.
Individuals and managers often use matching for different purposes.
Candidates and team members typically compare themselves across many roles and opportunities, while managers usually compare multiple people against the requirements of a specific role. Because the context is different, the information presented may also differ.
Potential-first matching prioritises potential as the primary matching signal.
Capability-first matching gives greater weight to demonstrated skills and assessed levels while continuing to use potential as an indicator of future readiness. Organisations can configure how much influence potential has within this approach.
No. Greenbeam considers capability alongside potential to provide a more complete view of both current readiness and future development.
If your skill profile is incomplete or missing assessed skill levels, your matches may be less complete or less informative. Completing your assessments and keeping your profile up to date will improve match quality.
Capability matching is designed to support better decisions by combining evidence of current capability with an understanding of future potential. It does not replace human judgement.