How capability and potential matching works
Greenbeam matching considers both a person’s potential and the skills and levels in their skill profile. This gives candidates, employees, hiring managers, and team leaders a clearer view of current fit and what it may take to become job-ready.
- Potential, based on Greenbeam's existing potential model surfacing natural strengths and role-fit
- Capability, based on the skills in a person's skill profile and the level they hold compared with what a role requires
What influences matching
- A person's potential
- The skills in their skill profile or skill bank
- The levels attached to those skills
- How those levels compare with the requirements of a role or opportunity
- The complexity or seniority of the role
For candidates and team members
- Where current skills are already aligned
- Where skill gaps may exist
- What may improve readiness for a role over time
For hiring managers and team leaders
- Potential-first matching helps surface future fit and growth potential
- Capability-first matching places more emphasis on demonstrated skills and assessed levels, while still using potential as a signal for how readily gaps may be bridged
What users can do to improve match quality
- Complete potential testing if it is not already complete
- Add skills to your skill bank
- Self-assess current skill levels
- Review and update the profile over time as experience grows
Frequently asked questions
Why might my match score change over time?
Match scores can change as skill profiles are updated, assessments are added or aligned, role requirements differ, or the role context changes. Matching reflects more than one factor, so scores may change as the information behind the match becomes more complete.
Has my potential changed if my score changes?
Not necessarily. A change in match score does not automatically mean potential has changed. Matching also considers capability and role context.
Why do I see my match differently from what a hiring manager or team leader sees?
Candidates and team members are usually looking at how they match across many roles and opportunities. Hiring managers and team leaders are usually looking at how many people match to a specific role.
Because those views are designed for different decisions, the context is not always identical. For example, managers may compare people against the requirements of one role more directly, while individuals may see their matches across a broader set of opportunities. That means the same person can appear slightly differently depending on the view being used.
What is the difference between potential-first and capability-first matching?
Potential-first matching prioritises potential as the main matching signal. Capability-first matching places more emphasis on demonstrated skills and assessed levels, with potential helping add context around future readiness and development - how much impact an organisation would like potential to have is able to be modified.
Does capability replace potential?
No. Your potential matters! Matching considers capability alongside potential so it can better reflect both current readiness and development potential.
What if my skills are not fully assessed yet?
Your matches may be less complete or less informative if your skill profile is missing skills or levels. Completing your potential testing and keeping your skill profile current will improve the quality of your matches.